What started with the branding effort of "Toxic Masculinity" has now turned into an outright campaign deeming masculinity to be eradicated.
David French has a great piece this week at the National Review, carving up the official guidelines issued by and for psychologists working with dudes:
along comes the American Psychological Association with its first-ever “Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Boys and Men.” The APA sees the challenges facing young men and rightly seeks to overcome those challenges, but then diagnoses the wrong cause. As Stephanie Pappas notes on the APA website, the new guidelines conclude that “traditional masculinity — marked by stoicism, competitiveness, dominance, and aggression — is, on the whole, harmful.”
The guidelines themselves argue that “traditional masculinity ideology” — defined as socializing boys toward “anti-femininity, achievement, eschewal of the appearance of weakness, and adventure, risk, and violence” — has been shown to “limit males’ psychological development, constrain their behavior, result in gender role strain and gender role conflict,” and negatively influence mental and physical health.
Or, as Heather Wilhelm asks: "Who is going to kill all my spiders?"
This week, the American Psychological Association delivered some sad news for fans of “traditional masculinity.” According to the organization’s new “Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Boys and Men,” the “harmful” ideology of masculinity — marked by “stoicism, competitiveness, dominance, and aggression” together with “anti-femininity, achievement, eschewal of the appearance of weakness, and adventure, risk, and violence” — has got to go.
Here I imagine a mournful, windswept cowboy — preferably Val Kilmer from Tombstone, or maybe Harrison Ford from Indiana Jones, but wearing a ten-gallon hat — riding off into the sunset, slumped and grim, dragging a sad cache of uneaten rare steaks and unused power tools behind him. Farewell, traditional masculinity! You are too toxic! The APA told us so! Don’t let those swinging Old West barroom doors hit you on the way out, causing the old-timey piano music to abruptly stop and all the dust-strewn poker players who may or may not have tuberculosis to turn and stare at you in shock and dismay!
Reader, I don’t know how you feel about all this. I, for one, find it very upsetting, for one simple and selfish reason: Who is going to kill all the spiders that make their way into my house?
This is precisely why Dr. Jordan Peterson has become an international guru of sorts (although he rejects any such title).
If you believe (as I do) that there are intrinsic differences between men and women, then you have a partial explanation for what is happening in our society with purposeless young men.
Of course, this is not the modern, popular, or chic opinion. But it does provide some clarity, whereas the APA guidance simply creates even more confusion:
After all, the very idea of “boys” and “men” is quite gendered and outdated, is it not? As the APA’s own new guidelines remind us, “it is critical to acknowledge that gender is a nonbinary construct that is distinct from, although interrelated to, sexual orientation.” Gender, argues Ryon McDermott, a psychologist who assisted in writing the guidelines, is “no longer just this male-female binary.”
So why even bother writing a report supposedly targeted at only boys and men? Who knows? Who cares? Oh, logic, you feckless, roaming tumbleweed! In any case, the guidelines aren’t really designed to discuss boys or men at all. Their main intention, it seems, is to hammer home the belief that everything gender-related is a social construct, that biology doesn’t matter until we want it to, and that we are all bound like helpless mummies under intersectional layers of oppression that are primarily generated by — surprise! — patriarchal men.
Pete's Prep Sheet: Thursday, Jan. 10, 2019
- South Carolina parents who let their kids play in a park by themselves won't face criminal punishment under a proposed "free range parenting" law.
- Will the new Democratic majority in the House use financial institutions to implement a de facto gun ban?
- A fertility rate of 2,100 births per 1,000 women is generally accepted as a necessary replacement for a society. According to the latest figures from the CDC, the American rate is 1,766.
- Iowa Republican Congressman Steve King wonders how "white supremacy" ever became an offensive term. Yes, really. He said it. In an interview with the New York Times, no less.